PERMENANT CURE OF DISEASE

As per usual, your redirect to chiro base, does not work without manipulation, then you find it is our old friend Stephen Barrett, not a real chiropractor talking about chiropractic, but one of the worlds most famous anti everything natural or non medical society approved hate mongers. It is a bit reminicent of the old meeting of the national medical convention in which one of the national presidents said that it was better to die under orthodox medical care than to get well under alternative care. Doc, all docs are indeed docs when so licensed or degreed, and deserve to be called doctors, including DCs, NDs, PhDs , DOs, ODs, DPMs, and MDs and the list goes on.

Point being that lifestyle is the single most important factor in most peoples health, Chiropractic and naturopathy recognized and were teaching that in the 1950s when the president of the California Medical Association was on bill boards above the freeways, cigarette in hand, with “a cigarette a day keeps the doctor away”  sign below his smiling face. Somewhat karmicly that MD died of lung cancer.

There is an increasing tendency for MDs and DCs to share offices and clinics. I had hospital privilages twenty years ago, and found working with the doctors to be a much better situation. It really is time patients begin to come first and bickering and prejudice take a back seat.  Unfortunately I moved and in other cities, chiropractors did not have hospital privilages at that time or even now. What would be good, is a little respect, honesty and willingness to work in a scientific manner togethar for the benefit of patients.

As you note, enemas have been used for thousands of years, with almost no negative effects, and you cannot find a single scientific article to explain why their use is suddenly out of fashion. I pointed out two to you yet you dont seem to be able to find them even knowing the year they were written, all you have to do is find the journal. Most medical schools have these journals if you are near a major city, so do some reading. It would be good for you, to try to increase your level of knowledge in this area. If you are near by, perhaps for a small fee I could guide you to the shelves where the books and journals are located in your medical school library. Enemas are not dangerous unless the nurse or doctor does not know what they are doing, and in our discussions, it is apparent that in this area your education is not really up to it, so if you don’t want to use them, that is understandable.

However, you should not be telling others who do know what they are doing, and are amply trained and knowledgable in the field what to do. Naturopaths and Chiropractors have education in this area, MDs usually do not. So I appreciate your offer for your profession to bow out of colon therapy and other areas in which you are not as well trained as chiropractors or naturopaths. However, I fear that you do not speak with the authority to bind your profession.

 

Amalgam Research in Dental School

I can promise you that you are having the better position, and will have more fun. It is becoming increasingly harder to be an amalgam advocate these days. Before you do anything else you should look up what your opponents will say or might come up with. Their main argument is that the dental health situation will get worse without amalgam since it is strong and durable (which it is, no doubt).

The classic argument against that is that composites are just as strong and that it is all a matter of technique. That gives non-amalgam dentistry an impression of having some sort of supreme quality stamp, which in turn makes people (and the Public) think that the non-amalgam dentists are somewhat better than the traditional amalgam using dentists. That’s an argument that always will make them upset.

When it comes to hard data, *scientific facts*, the best way to put it is that the jury is still out. Even if it has been on its way in for the past 15 years it is still not seated.

There are a lot of studies proving the safety of amalgam intra-orally, but there are also studies that really put a question-mark on this. It seems as the human organism is dealing with mercury as it does with all heavy metals, especially lead. And there is for sure an individual upper limit for every-one how much they can take. Inner city dwellers, which have a higher concentration of lead in their system, might be more susceptible to the accumulation of other metals.

Facts are, however, that all responsible authorities in the world are trying to decease the use of mercury, and that the use has gone down incredibly during the last decades. Still, the concentration of mercury in see food and air is increasing. That’s why it is paramount to reduce all possible sources of mercury, of which dental amalgam is one. This will be your strongest argument. I do not know how deep you are planning on penetrating this issue, but if you want scientific references on amalgam safety as well as potential health hazards, just let me know.

There are “Medically-related” doctors: Optometrists, Chiropractors, etc. These doctors cannot prescribe medications but still treat medical disorders according to their training and research.

 

 

Chiropractors and Rolfers

A chiropractor performs manipulations.  If you believe in bacteria, microbes, and viruses as being causes of diseases (rather than spinal column irregularaties or some such), then chiropracty is not appropriate for a large class of problems.  However, it is probably an appropriate *option* for muscle strains and back trouble (or neck trouble) of a variety of type.  I treatments were occasionally slightly painful for me, but I was in pain when I started (or was in certain positions).  Obviously, if I hadn’t had any complaints, I would not have gone.  I got some help. I sort of went out of curiosity.  I had been to rolfers before, and wanted to try something different.  The “cracking” that the chirpractors do is rather unnerving, but didn’t hurt.

The Consumer Reports had a series of articles about chiropractic a few years ago.  They were not very complimentary. Rolfing (developed by the late Ida Rolf) is a bodywork procedure which attempts to realign the body.  The approach is to apply a moderately painful pressure using elbows, hands, or fingertips as appropriate.  The fascia (a sheath which covers the muscles and gives the body its shape) is stretched by this process and in general the body regains its natural shape.

The two procedures are quite different.  The Rolfing school of thought is that when there is a structural misalignment, the tissue and bone are used to a certain position.  If you move the bone without doing something with the surrounding tissue, the bone will gradually move back to where it was, since that is where the tissue is expecting it.

I got Rolfed in l975 because of pinched nerve in my neck.  I had gone to an orthopedist and he had prescribed an anti-inflammatory and physical therapy.  When I was in traction, I felt fine, but as soon as the pull released, I hurt again.  I reasoned that if Rolfing could let my neck pop up a little, I would feel OK.  That is what happened.

People who get Rolfed usually have some recall of buried psychological material.  Also, they will be emotionally much looser afterwards. The principal drawback is cost.  The normal arrangement is 10 sessions each about 1 to 1 1/2 hours, $75 a throw (LA rates).  They may be a little higher now (1984 — inflation).  I would recommend looking at the before/after pictures in Ida Rolf’s book.  You can see the improvement in how those people are standing.

There is a similar procedure to Rolfing called Heller work.  I cannot comment except to say that my understanding is that it is essentially the same concept.  There may be a slight difference in philosophy. Rolfing was the most powerful thing that I have ever done, at least in a human potential movement sense.  The psychological material just flew up at me, and I had a terrible time dealing with it.  I used to go to Rolfing on Monday, and psychotherapy on Wednesday.  My therapy was and has been much more effective since getting Rolfed.

I’ve been rambling.  One last item:  The benefits of Rolfing are likely to last for some time.  It is a situation similar to the Reichiann (sp?) body armor stuff.  Whatever the situations which caused us to armor ourselves, we are probably better able to cope with that as an adult, or the situation may no longer exist (sibling rivalry, abusive parents, what have you).

 

Help With Newsgroup!

The poor chiropractors see the entire world in terms of a single treatment modality, spinal manipulation. A well-trained physiotherapist can do precisely the same manipulations *when* *called* *for* but also has a host of other treatment modalities at his command: traction, heat, diathermy, exercise, electrical stimulation, etc. etc.

Moreover, though the chiros deny it, there’s always this smarmy, oily, nudge-nudge, wink-wink business about “we don’t want to c-u-t you” as though the MD’s and surgeons were lusting to put the scalpel to you. Really, the way the chiropractors carry on, you’d think that surgeons went into the specialty as a way of getting sexual release.

I think it’s the tendency of chiropractors to set themselves up as an *alternative” to orthodox medical treatment, instead of an adjunct, that really rots my socks. The physiotherapists always work in conjunction with the MD’s. There’s no pretense of conflict. They are a supplement to medical care, not a replacement for it.

Lots of cervical spine injuries are *caused* by chiropractic manipulation. An MD friend told me that when he was an intern at St. Paul’s Hospital in Vancouver, they regularly saw cervical fractures caused by chiropractic manipulation, and lately the Canadian medical association has issued a warning against manipulation of the neck because it can cause a stroke. The chiropractors of course backpedalled like mad “oh, we’ve improved our training, blah blah blah”. Yeah, sure, what about the ones that went to school decades ago and haven’t learned a thing since?

Chiropractic was in its origins an out-and-out quack therapy: cures cancer, asthma, acne, liver disease, and impotence. As far as I’m concerned, it’s still a quack therapy.

 

 

Getting Old

I note that chiropractors and neurosurgeons have been recommended, but no-one has mentioned Osteopathic Physicians.  They receive much the same training as an MD, along with the training of a chiropractor, and, I believe, some introduction into other branches of medicine.  I have a number of friends who are either already DOs, or on their way to becoming same.  Very conscientious, and caring people.  Check one out.

BTW, I’m 52 years old, formerly a heavy smoker, formerly really fat, and presently an aerobics instructor.  Age isn’t got a thing to do with it.  Everybody gets aches, pains, and crackles in the joints.  Last night, I attended a 4-hour step and circuit workshop, and was one of the three (of 15 to start) who actually finished it. This morning, I taught an Advanced Step class at 8AM.  

Unless your body is in pain, what you’re feeling is probably just an adjustment.  Here’s a stretch you can try which may alleviate the specific symptom.  It may get slightly uncomfortable, but if it _hurts_, stop immediately!

1. Lie on your back, and draw your feet in toward your buttocks    as if you were going to do ab crunches.  The knees should be    bent at about 90 degrees.

2. Lift your feet off the floor, and raise the leg, knee still bent, until your shins are parallel to the ceiling.

3. Stretch your arms out to either side, pressing your shoulders and your lower back to the floor.

4. _Slowly_ rotates your lower body until your knees start to lower to the floor.  Keep your shoulders grounded, and let    the weight of your legs draw your knees to the floor.

5. When you’re underneath knee touches the floor, gently lift the upper leg, and move the toe of that foot over to just    touch the floor beside or just in front of the lower knee. Hold that position for at least 20 seconds.

6. Bring your feet back together, and gently rotate the lower body in the opposite direction, raising the knees up to the top once again.

7. Repeat steps 4 to 6 in the opposite direction.

8. Bring the soles of your feet together, and draw the feet in until you can grab your ankles with your hands.  Pull the feet in toward your groin, while spreading your knees and pressing outward on the inner thigh with your elbows.

9. Return the legs to the 90 degree position, and slowly let the feet go back to the floor.

This is one of the most effective stretches I know of for eliminating the occasional “crick in the back”, and the odd pops and crackles.  

 

Auditing Process “R2-45″ solution for Columbine shooting

In the wake of the Columbine High School shooting, Front Sight Firearms Training Institute, which claims to be the world leader in providing intensified courses in the defensive use of firearms for private citizens, feels they have the answer to stopping further attack on school children. Front Sight is offering free firearm training to any school administrator, teacher, or full-time staff member designated as school Safety Monitors.

Front Sight will accept for training up to three staff members from each school. Applicants must submit a letter requesting training on school district letterhead signed by the top school district official and designating the applicant as th school’s safety monitor. Front Sight’s founder and director, Dr Ignatius Piazza understands that his offer may offend some school administrators and parents who do not see arming and training selected school staff members as a positive solution to violent attacks. However he is quick to point out that historically, his approach has worked while gun control has actually increased violent crime by shifting the balance of power to favor the criminals and lunatics.

 

Deadbeat Docs

There was a very interesting headline today from the Washington AP:

“More than 1400 doctors and other healthcare workers who defaulted on student loans will no longer be reimbursed for treating Medicare and Medicaid patients. The names of the 1402 defaulters were posted on the Internet today (Jan. 20) and also will be published in the Federal Register. They include physicians, dentists, podiatrists, psychologists and health care administrators, the majority of whom work in California, Florida, Georgia, New York, Pennsylvania, and Texas. The largest group of practitioners on the list is chiropractors. The defaulters owe more than $107 million.”

I eventually got into it, although it DID take a lot of time to open up, and in retrospect, really wasn’t worth the time I spent.  The names in PA were mostly chiropractors. I didn’t recognize any of the names myself.

RE download time, we’re on the list to beta test our cable company’s entry into high-speed internet access, called Power Link.  It’s supposed to be 100 times faster than a phone modem. can’t wait! Not that it’s an excuse for them, mind you, but some of them owe really huge amounts of money.   Tuition is really outrageous and you can’t afford the school if you don’t take out those enormous loans.  

You’ll notice a lot of chiropractors on that list.  It’s extremely difficult now to make a go of chiropractic.   In most areas, there is a glut of chiropractors and they can’t bring in much money to begin with.  I forget the exact percentage of chiropractors whose practices fail, but it’s incredibly high.  Something like 50, 60, or 75%.

 

What is a D.O.?

A doctor of osteopathy is a person who has attended a medical school that has a focus in the world of osteopaths.  Their history is one of belief and practice of manipulation in addition to or precluding surgery or other allopathic practices. These docs are considered allopath’s and take the same state exams as any other medical doctor. They practice on the line and the alternative approaches as well.  I think of Dr. Weil when the term osteopath comes to mind.  He is not an osteon though it is just his approach. There is a large school in Pomona, California for Osteopaths and they have a URL. Sorry I don’t have it handy but it is easy to find. Is this more than you ever wanted to know?

In New York osteopaths were not considered doctors and they are no long called osteopaths but chiropractors. They do manipulation but they cannot prescribe drugs as they are not full-fledged doctors. They just take courses in that field.

Low Back Pain and Pool

All 50 states and the District of Columbia regulate the practice of chiropracty and grant licenses to chiropractors who meet educational requirements and pass a state board examination. Many States have reciprocity agreements that permit chiropractors already licensed in another state to obtain a license without taking an examination.

The type of practice permitted (scope of practice) and the educational requirements for a license vary considerably from one state to another, but in general, State licensing boards require successful completion of a 4-year chiropractic course following 2 years of college. Thirty-eight state boards recognize only academic training in chiropractic colleges accredited by the Council on Chiropractic Education. Some states require specific college courses such as English, chemistry, biology, or physics. Several states require that chiropractors pass a basic science examination. The National Board of Chiropractic Examiners’ test given to chiropractic students is accepted by 48 state boards in place of a state examination. To maintain licensure, 41 states require that chiropractors complete a specified number of hours of continuing education each year to remain current in the field.

In 1990, 9 of the 15 chiropractic colleges in the United States were fully accredited by the Council on Chiropractic Education; 5 others were recognized candidates working towards accreditation. All chiropractic colleges require applicants to have a minimum of 2 years of undergraduate study, including courses in English, the social sciences, chemistry, biology, physics, and mathematics.

 

Chiropractors in the Gym

So I’m sitting there spotting my 15 year old brother who is squatting 155 lbs for 10 reps with perfect form in my local gym when our friendly neighborhood chiropractor walks up. “You know, you really need to get a weight belt on him, especially if he’s going to go so heavy that young.  He could slip a disc and have back problems for the rest of his life.  I see it all the time.”

After arguing that there are benefits to squatting without the belt and that it’s possible that it could even prevent an injury by ensuring that an imbalance between leg and lower back strength doesn’t develop, and indicating that his lack of a belt wasn’t something that I had forced upon him, he shook his head and stormed off.  After he left, my brother asked me if he should wear a belt on his next set.  I told him it was up to him, and he squatted his last set with the belt.

Was I wrong?  I’ve heard that as long as you’re squatting with a weight you can handle, and doing so with good form, the belt is unnecessary, and possibly even detrimental in the long run.  Any one have any good cites for or against this arguement?  I used to squat with a belt all the time, because they didn’t really give us a choice in school, but since finding mfw and working out on my own, I’ve given it up and don’t miss it at all.  I don’t ever do really low rep squats and I always try to keep my form as strict as possible.  Squatting usually gives me a decent lower back workout.  Am I going to injure myself?

I don’t put much value in the opinion of most chiropractors. It’s like someone with a two year psychology degree trying to treat depression.  Clinical research I’ve seen did not show evidence that the belts help.  You can’t prove they don’t, but that’s because it’s logically impossible to prove a negative assertion.